Renewal of Auxiliary Drive Belt - When ?

T6WOLF

Member
VIP Member
Evening All. Advice needed please. At what interval / mileage should this be changed ? Further.....should the tensioner be renewed as a matter of course ? I suppose the cost will be eye-watering......My van is 5 years old and has covered 37,000 miles. Wolfe.
 
There is no fixed interval, if you want a labour free renewal do it at the same time as the timing belt / water pump kit renewal.
Note there is a debatable interval on the timing belt renewal in the UK, use Search and ‘cam belt’.
In addition check the smart ‘bluemotion’ alternator pulley clutch while the aux’ belt is removed.
EDIT: just so your’re aware if the aux’ belt breaks it CAN wrap up in the crank pulley, break the lower timing belt cover and break the timing belt which will result in catastrophic engine damage.
A classic case of a high value piece of machinery with the maintenance regime of a food mixer.
 
Last edited:

I was surprised when VW Wooburn Green replaced my Aux belt under warranty at 3 years/14,000 miles - almost the same time as dah78’s van went in?
I will probably replace again at 8 year timing belt change.
 
On my van 2010 t5.1 2.0tdi 102, the old belt has stretched so much the tensioner pulley was just about touching the idler pulley, causing the belt to rub on itself. I’m guessing this shouldn’t happen, there is a restrictor bump stop on the tensioner but it doesn’t stop it in time. Anyone else had this happen? Cheers

IMG_4915.jpeg
 
How to measure if your aux’ belt is within the elongation / wear limit

1692044422475.jpeg
 
Yes, it means the belt is seriously worn :rolleyes:

Change it ASAP
Oh it’s changed. What I’m trying to say is, I wouldn’t have thought that by design a worn belt would allow the tensioner to touch the idler. Surly the tensioners travel should stop before that happens?
 
Oh it’s changed. What I’m trying to say is, I wouldn’t have thought that by design a worn belt would allow the tensioner to touch the idler. Surly the tensioners travel should stop before that happens?
The belt should not get that worn that the tensioner does make contact. If the tensioner travel was restricted, you'd probably have the belt shedding, possibly with further damage.
 
The belt should not get that worn that the tensioner does make contact. If the tensioner travel was restricted, you'd probably have the belt shedding, possibly with further damage.
I agree, it shouldn’t be left that long.
I think the belt shedding would probably be better than catastrophic failure when they touch.
 
I agree, it shouldn’t be left that long.
I think the belt shedding would probably be better than catastrophic failure when they touch.
One is closely followed by the other, you’re correct in highlighting it, just another easily avoidable design flaw, no surprise.
Design engineers are often ‘too intelligent’ for their own good, there is a train of thought that following service intervals and procedures eliminates all failures.
 
One is closely followed by the other, you’re correct in highlighting it, just another easily avoidable design flaw, no surprise.
Design engineers are often ‘too intelligent’ for their own good, there is a train of thought that following service intervals and procedures eliminates all failures.
My reason for asking the question really was to check there wasn’t something else causing the pulleys to touch other than a stretched belt, ie idler pulley faulty. I was checking it wasn’t specific to my van because of another issue. No one’s really said they have had the same issue yet, just that my belt was overly worn.
 
Great info, but does the fact the tensioner fouls the idler pulley indicate there is a problem?
It shows there a serious problem with servicing and inspection. The belt should never be allowed to wear anywhere near this much, so it's irrelevant whether the tensioner has a stop or not.
 
It shows there a serious problem with servicing and inspection. The belt should never be allowed to wear anywhere near this much, so it's irrelevant whether the tensioner has a stop or not.
So is the tensioner supposed to stop before fouling or not?
 
Obviously yes in this case. If serviced, no. It cannot be put in plainer words. I don't see why you are labouring the point.
 
Back
Top