I remember a friend carrying something like a small suitcase in his LWB Station Wagon Landrover it was the very first car phone or mobile phone that I ever saw and quite heavy every time he came to ours he was charging it up. Out of his LR it always accompanied him. He used to travel extensively throughout Europe and Russia and could speak very barely Every European language including Russian and polish and Eastern Europe He also used to have a Sat dish that spanned the entire width of his Landrover. he used to watch Foreign European Languages Especially the ones that he was trying to perfect. The other strange or unusual thing was he would stop over very near to military sites in the Eastern block and quite openly sit watching TV almost well most probably deliberately inviting Police and Military Police to investigate him. Usually the would eventually after enquiries watch TV with him Very extraordinary person very intellectually developed and reasoned and quite happy to explain his reasoning as he brewed up and shared coffee and biscuits with armed men. He was never bothered or troubled by potential problems being totally confident in his own abilities and powers of persuasion that he would win-out and he did of course he was absolutely fluent in those languages. When he dated ladies they where nearly always from countries that had languages that he wanted to improve on. Very mercenary and deliberate.
Ultimately cheaper, there's a thing, despite the 80s Motorola transportables weighing a ton and having to be plugged into the cars power or eating through the docking base battery in minutes, at over £1 per minute too, oh that and the early networks not extending beyond London.I don’t recall any government having to introduce legislation to force us to use mobile phones, over nipping out to the phone box on the corner in the pi55ing rain to shovel 10p pieces into it. Mobile phones took over because they were more convenient, and ultimately cheaper than the alternative. The product was a much better alternative to the one it replaced. Just sayin’
Aviation pollution is tightly regulated (with ever more challenging targets) and domestic aviation is part of the government’s net-zero target. Improvements in jet engine efficiency have made a massive difference in recent decades (fuel usage as well as pollution) and sustainable fuels are not far away.If authorities where serious about pollution air travel would be seriously curtailed but no they are even trying to pinch it away from Europe with additional runways.
Hope it's a carbon-neutral chair!wow..."governments net zero target"...and then concern about .."impact on UK economy" from restricting aviation.......I just fell off my chair.
Yeah, but I think he must be marred to an elephant!This guy nails it
??Yeah, but I think he must be marred to an elephant!![]()
Reading his bio on Wikipedia adds a bit of background to his agenda but as Russian pseudo intellectuals go, yes, some people can agree with his observations.This guy nails it
A bit pompous.pseudo intellectuals
Now why can’t government think like that?This guy nails it
@06:37
Ouch. Hope it didn’t hurt!!I just fell off my chair.
I was referring to went to university but didn't complete his degree, pompous maybe but why masquerade as an intellectual when you're simply acting the part.A bit pompous.

A counter argument is worthy of consideration - an ad hominem attack, less so.I was referring to went to university but didn't complete his degree, pompous maybe but why masquerade as an intellectual when you're simply acting the part.
I'll take Stephen Fry over this berk any day of the week.![]()