Thank you very much. Attached a graph of active data during the test. The other data didn't change (much) and were within observed values in other logs of normal use.Here we go - proper log file attached in CSV format. Took me a while to find where VCDS was saving them. The actual test only lasted for about a minute or so. It said it completed successfully.

That's really useful stuff to know. Many thanks for the analysis. Last night I figured out that the injector is actually a solenoid valve and is exactly the same operation as a water treatment chemical dosing pump (handy to have old job experience!). I put 12 volts DC on the terminal plug and the injector clicked operating the valve. It appears to work but looks like it could be temperamental.Thank you very much. Attached a graph of active data during the test. The other data didn't change (much) and were within observed values in other logs of normal use.
A kind of interesting thing is that it seems the pump was not driven at max but at very low PWM (now 5% as normally can be seen up to 80%) - perhaps to see that AdBlue is injected also at low end of usage. Likewise the specified quantity (now at steady 4 mg/s as normally up to 220 mg/s have been observed).
The pressure reading is most likely based on pump current measurement (mentioned in SSP 540) so probably - also within observed values.
View attachment 298232
Well, the usual indication of "Finished correctly" quite often means only that the ECU was able to perform the test from start to finish - not indicating the system was within specifications. Hence need to set up proper measurements and acceptance criteria using "Show measurement values". "VW ODIS Guided fault finding" has sometimes built-in the acceptance criteria but rarely shows the data itself - perhaps not to let mechanic learn too much of the internalsThe test said it passed OK
Yeah. I was certainly sceptical when it said "passed OK"Well, the usual indication of "Finished correctly" quite often means only that the ECU was able to perform the test from start to finish - not indicating the system was within specifications. Hence need to set up proper measurements and acceptance criteria using "Show measurement values". "VW ODIS Guided fault finding" has sometimes built-in the acceptance criteria but rarely shows the data itself - perhaps not to let mechanic learn too much of the internals![]()
Perhaps the first step would be to disconnect the connector at injector and check what/any new fault codes appear - to indicate how an actual disconnect shows up.I might do a continuity test of the 2 core cable from the ECU to the injector to see if it's a dodgy cable.
I think I have wiring diagrams somewhere on my laptop showing pinouts of the ECU connector.

Perhaps the first step would be to disconnect the connector at injector and check what/any new fault codes appear - to indicate how an actual disconnect shows up.
No, the fuel pump runs with engine running only.I realised if you are in the van with the key in position 1 in the ignition it keeps the fuel pump constantly priming. Well, I'm guessing it's that sound I can hear.
Aha ! That's interestingThis is gonna sound crazy so take it with a pinch of salt but throwing the van around corners to swish the adblue around the tank seems to help.
Ah right. So that's what it was. Interesting stuff!No, the fuel pump runs with engine running only.
It's either EGR cooler pump or auxiliary coolant pump
| IDE10032 Reducing agent quality sensor: urea concentration 0.00 % |
| IDE10039 Reducing agent quality sensor: validity invalid |
Well, correct for this engine software I would say. This far for CXGB engine software 04L 906 056 KA only those values have been observed (blockmaps of 6 different engines in the Forum). However, some other engine softwares indeed report non-zero values.It is showing the Urea concentration of 0% and therefore the quality to be invalid.
I think the concentartion should be around 35% ? - Is that correct @mmi ?
These?To my untrained eyes the urea concentration and invalid sensor looks suspect
| IDE10032 | Reducing agent quality sensor: urea concentration | 0 |
| IDE10039 | Reducing agent quality sensor: validity | invalid |
So I got the Adblue from the local Tesco petrol filling station. I can't remember the name of the exact brand but I have seen it about in lots of places so I'm assuming it is going to be OK. I do get the feeling that it should hopefully just sort itself out soon enough. I'm sure I should find out when I drive to Kelmarsh and back (240 mile round trip).Probably a red herring but in your original log it had the following:
IDE10032 Reducing agent quality sensor: urea concentration 0.00 % IDE10039 Reducing agent quality sensor: validity invalid
It is showing the Urea concentration of 0% and therefore the quality to be invalid.
I think the concentartion should be around 35% ? - Is that correct @mmi ?
Where did you get the ADblue from, and is it now looking better since you have refilled the tanks etc?