That's from typing in Cheshire for @Macp location, again a car that was everywhere here in Northampton before the vehicle obesity epidemic broke out, I like the orangey red metallic ones with the RS badge and 200 hp.


...or a mint green one or an invalid blue one.Just don't get a pink one.

Will she let me borrow it?Please don't show this to my daughter...

She won't let me too.Will she let me borrow it?![]()
I like the Clio but they were pretty bad during the noughties like Peugeot. But folk have been saying they have improved considerably over the past few years.
That's from typing in Cheshire for @Macp location, again a car that was everywhere here in Northampton before the vehicle obesity epidemic broke out, I like the orangey red metallic ones with the RS badge and 200 hp.![]()
I drove a 2015 Fiat 500 1.2S and found it surprisingly nice to drive. With a define feeling of fun about it. Noted that the 2017 on cars have taken a significant jump in the infotainment.Some random A segment musings...
A FART 500? Not my cup of tea, and probably not yours, but if Mrs MacP is going to be the main user she'll likely be happy.
They're decent to drive, broad range of engines and trim to choose from, reliable enough, easy and cheap to fix, economical, and there are so many about you can pick one up cheaper than a gummy job from a Glasgow crack ho.
Just don't get a pink one.
Or a late Panda? Much the same car but without any pretention and with extra practicality.
Twingo? Unorthodox, but good fun and surprisingly spacious cabins. Turbo ones go very well yet still sip fuel. Ditto the Smart, which is essentially the same car with a nose job and a slightly higher snob factor. Extremely well equipped, and you get 4 doors like a proper car. Robust engines and drive trains. A very left field option, but well worth a test drive.
The VW Group triplets are worthy, but very dull. I wear cardigans to would be happy there, but if if you have any shred of soul or ambition left you could do so much better.
Aston Martin CygnetWe want a small car that that feels more solid, and more like an actual car.
If you're looking at an Aygo then consider 107/8 and the Citroen C1.Thanks for the reply. So I think we have drawn up a list now. Starting in order of popularity.
Kia Picanto - 2017 on
Hyundai I10 - 2017 on
Toyota Aygo - 2017 on
Skoda Citigo - 2014 on
Smart ForFour built on the same platform and uses the same M281 engineSome random A segment musings...
Twingo? Unorthodox, but good fun and surprisingly spacious cabins. Turbo ones go very well yet still sip fuel. Ditto the Smart, which is essentially the same car with a nose job and a slightly higher snob factor. Extremely well equipped, and you get 4 doors like a proper car. Robust engines and drive trains. A very left field option, but well worth a test drive.
Will it fit in the back?Just to update we got a very clean 67 plate Skoda Citygo Colour edition with 57,000mls. The dealer is even delivering it using his Amarok.
Of my van ?Will it fit in the back?
FTFY.Just to update we got a very clean 67 plate Skoda Citygo Colour edition with 57,000mls. The dealer is even delivering it using his Ford Ranger in drag.
Out ou curiosity, did you fit in the budget?Just to update we got a very clean 67 plate Skoda Citygo Colour edition with 57,000mls. The dealer is even delivering it using his Amarok.
An excellent question thankyou. The car came in at a shade over 5k. And the dealer was just superb. Maybe because he was gen X ??Out ou curiosity, did you fit in the budget?