No mate, it’s called becoming a member. I bet you did it once
Holbrook dubs
- Thread starter VWWinnie
- Start date
Of course I've done it, that's how I'm here, but I did it for different reasons to you, I'm not here to defend a business that I've obviously got some connection to.No mate, it’s called becoming a member. I bet you did it once
Just sharing my experience like everyone else mate.
Good to hear
Now now. Just because Mark lives just the other side of the Prince of Wales bridge doesnt mean hes anything to do with them.
How did you know about the 'hate page' if you weren't a member? Did your good mates ' Matt and Candice' tell you about it?
Maybe if you had become a useful member of the forum first then your opinions would have been received with more trust.
Last edited:
But most of the members on this group are either deleted or new? Is that not suspect?
This comes up on Google mate
Haven't got a clue what you are going on about there 'mate' do you?But most of the members on this group are either deleted or new? Is that not suspect?
This comes up on Google mate
your having a pop because I’m a new member, when half of the people on here are new members or deleted members. Just pointing out the obvious.
I’m allowed to come on here and give a positive review, surely?
Would love a screen shot of the Google page that told you that
You've (deliberately?) missed my point. You have free rein to express your opinion, as do others. What you don't have is the right to expect everyone to agree with your viewpoint nor do you have the right to question the authenticity of others' viewpoints.
If you are unable to accept this, then I can understand your disinterest in forums, as reasoned debate requires a modicum of self-awareness and maturity.
Of course you are, but we are allowed to be suspicious of you, aren't we?
No, you weren't - you were also disrespectful towards those that had previously posted contra experiences.
@Bav I assume this one from a deleted member is acceptable? Not bullying or condescending?Stock response from Candice at Holbrookalways the customers fault....
I’m a genuine customer of Matt and Candice, and they have asked me to come on here. I will continue to defend them.
So you aren’t an Honest Broker in this affair? Which is perfectly ok as long as you declare an interest and don’t wander off down the Astroturfing route. If, as a spokesperson for Holbrook, you wish to give another side of things, knock yourself out. State your case and let reasonable people form their own opinions from the information provided by both sides. What you can’t do is pretend to be an independent happy customer, now that you’ve stated that you’re here at the behest of Holbrook. Anything you say needs to be taken in that context.
I don't condone others questioning the authenticity of your original post, but I understand why they have.
You had no basis to insult the previous posters - but you did.
You were unable refute what they'd posted - but you dismissed their input and encouraged others to ignore them.
Rightly or wrongly, your initial post gave the impression of someone with an agenda or someone with 'skin in the game' and this is the reason the authenticity of your initial post has been been questioned. If you'd have simply posted your feedback in a factual manner without throwing shade at others, no-one would have questioned your authenticity.
I am. I am a customer who has been asked to leave a review on this forum. In the same way others have. I’m sure if my review was negative I wouldn’t be having to fight my way through this.
to make it simpler, I bought a van 3 months ago. I’m buzzing. I wanted to leave a good review. That’s that. I’m extremely happy. Which appears to be painful for people to hear
This is toxic this thread.
